MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408423862 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-4542

Fuel loads and peat smouldering carbon loss increase following peatland drainage

2025· preprint· en· W4408423862 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gregory J. Verkaik, SOPHIE WILKINSON, Paul Moore, J. M. Waddington

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatEnvironmental scienceDrainageCarbon fibersHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEcologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern peatlands store ~500 Pg C and are important ecosystems for global climate regulation. Wildfire is the largest natural disturbance to peatlands within the Boreal Plains of western Canada. Historically, low-severity fires in this region release less carbon than accumulates over a fire return interval (~120 years), allowing peatlands to maintain their carbon sink function. While peat combustion (measured as the depth of burn; DOB) is typically low, ranging from 5-10 cm (representing carbon emissions of ~1 kg C m-2), during prolonged drought, or in drained peatlands, peat burn severity can reach depths >1 m (~100 kg C m-2), threatening the carbon sink function of boreal peatlands. We aimed to assess how peatland drainage altered the spatiotemporal variability in forest cover, aboveground biomass, and tree productivity and how these changes related to the spatial variability in peat burn severity from a fire 24 years post-drainage. Using remote sensing techniques, forest cover and biomass were estimated through time and with distance from the nearest ditch. Field surveys and a LiDAR-based analysis were conducted to measure the spatial variability in peat burn severity. Peatland drainage increased forest cover and aboveground biomass. Drained peatland margins had the greatest peat burn severity with a mean depth of burn of 26.9 ± 12.6 cm (34.0 ± 10.1 kg C m-2) and some locations experienced DOB >90 cm (>87 kg C m-2), where peat burn severity increased with proximity to drainage ditches and greater aboveground biomass. Peatland drainage increases both aboveground and peat fuel loads through the triggering of positive peatland drying feedbacks which increase peatland vulnerability to deep smouldering, with peatland margins experiencing the greatest peat burn severity. Drained peatlands represent a severe fire risk that can be challenging for communities and fire management agencies. Peatland restoration should be integrated into fuel management strategies to reduce the fire risk that drained peatlands pose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→