MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408425247 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-6912

Detection Limits of the GHGSat Constellation for Carbon Dioxide and Methane

2025· preprint· en· W4408425247 on OpenAlexaff
Mathias Strupler, Ariane Deslières, Marianne Girard, Dylan Jervis, Jean-Philippe W. MacLean, David B. Marshall, Jason McKeever, Becket Osterland, Zoya Qudsi, Antoine Ramier, Ewan Tarrant, D. R. Young

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsGHGSat (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstellationMethaneCarbon dioxideEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryChemistryPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GHGSat launched its first satellite dedicated to carbon dioxide monitoring in October 2023, joining GHGSat’s ten satellite methane-sensing constellation. All the satellites are designed to measure and attribute emissions at the facility level, leveraging their ~30 meter-scale spatial resolution. Understanding the detection threshold of both CO2 and CH4 satellites is crucial, not only as a fundamental performance metric, but also for interpreting observations where no emissions are detected (null observations). This understanding is especially important when combining observations from multiple sites or times. For methane-sensitive satellites, GHGSat has built a large dataset of controlled releases, including both self-organized and third-party single-blind studies. Analysis of this dataset shows a detection threshold of 102 kg/hr, with a 50% probability of detection (PoD) at a wind speed of 3 m/s. One shortcoming is that controlled releases repeatedly measure the same sites at varying source rates, and the number of controlled release sites is limited. These sites might not represent the full spectrum of measurement conditions encountered by the constellation around the world. To address this issue, we adapt the non-linear PoD model developed by Conrad et al.[1] with the goal of providing site- and time-specific detection thresholds. We will also present an update on the performance of GHGSat’s first CO2-sensitive satellite. We will highlight the difference between CH4 and CO2 point source detection such as co-emission of CO2 with aerosols, multiple release points at a given facility and the high elevation of the release points. We will also present a preliminary analysis of detection threshold by comparing detection events and continuous emission monitoring data available from some power plants. [1] Conrad, B. M., Tyner, D. R. & Johnson, M. R. Robust probabilities of detection and quantification uncertainty for aerial methane detection: examples for three airborne technologies. Remote Sens. Environ. 288, 113499 (2023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→