MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408425251 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-6863

Spatiotemporal Causal Effect Estimation in Complex Dynamical Systems

2025· preprint· en· W4408425251 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Herman, Jakob Runge

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimationComputer scienceDynamical systems theoryStatistical physicsEconometricsMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Causal Inference is essential for identifying and quantifying causal relationships in systems where randomized controlled experiments are infeasible, but the high dimensionality and co-variability structure of spatiotemporal dynamical systems such as the climate system pose special challenges for causal effect estimation. It is standard for climate scientists to reduce the dimension of their data with pre-processing procedures such as regional means and principal component analysis, but taking a regional mean may mask differences in spatial pattern – such as the difference between Eastern Pacific and Central Pacific El Niño events – that may be relevant for causal relationships. Similarly, principal component analysis may obscure true causal relationships because the spatial pattern associated with maximum co-variability may not be the causally relevant information. Instead of using these preprocessing techniques, the basic procedure of time series causal effect estimation can be simply extended to multivariate time series, but this introduces new complications and heightens already existing complications of time series causal effect estimation. Here, we discuss these complications and present practical solutions. Complications for multi-variate as well as univariate time series include: (1) neighboring points in time and space may be very similar if the scale of the spatiotemporal sampling rate is small relative to the characteristic scale of the variance, resulting in unstable estimations, (2) the do-calculus expression for estimating the response to a hard intervention may include calculations with spatiotemporal gradients so strong they would result in instabilities in the system, and finally, (3) it is often not possible to actually perform a hard intervention in dynamical systems, making the interpretation of the causal effect unclear. The first complication may be addressed using L2 regularization, and the second and third complications may be addressed by focusing on soft interventions of reasonable magnitude that approach zero on their spatiotemporal boundaries. A unique complication of multi-variate causal effect estimation is that, when using L2 regularization, the total causal influence of a climate variable will be penalized inverse-proportionally to the number of spatial datapoints. This complication can be addressed by scaling variables so that the total spatiotemporal variance, rather than the component-wise variance, is one. We showcase the power of the technique by quantifying the spatiotemporal causal effect of El Niño-related sea surface temperature variability on atmospheric pressure variability in the North Atlantic in unforced Community Earth System Model simulations. We demonstrate that spatiotemporal causal effect estimation allows us to simultaneously determine the relevant spatial patterns and more accurately quantify a pattern-dependent causal effect between ENSO and NAO that has thus far proven difficult to measure in observational studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207