MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408428055 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12508

Evidence for onset of convergent tectonics within the Continent-Ocean Transition zones of the Atlantic rifted margins

2025· preprint· en· W4408428055 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Cadenas, J. Kim Welford, Gabriela Fernández‐Viejo, João C. Duarte, Luı́s Somoza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTectonicsTransition (genetics)Plate tectonicsPaleontologyOceanographySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the onset of convergent tectonics, lithospheric contractional deformation precedes the stages of plate rupture and underthrusting that foster subduction initiation. It is widely agreed that pre-existing lithospheric structural variations favour localisation of deformation and may be critical for subduction inception. Along magma-poor rifted margins, the Continent Ocean Transition (COT) includes structurally complex zones of thinned continental crust and serpentinized exhumed mantle, which are prone to deformation. Incipient contractional deformation during the Alpine Orogeny resulted in the formation of thrusts and folds along the COT of the reactivated magma-poor Iberian Atlantic and Armorican margins. Numerical models testing subduction initiation at magma-poor margins also reproduce thrusting and folding along the COT prior to the formation of a lithospheric shear zone within serpentinized exhumed mantle that initiates underthrusting. However, the distribution of thrusts along thinned continental crust and serpentinized exhumed mantle remains unconstrained, although it may be critical to decipher the localisation of deformation that occurs prior to and during the underthrusting stage. The North Iberian margin uniquely preserves fossilized Alpine thrusts along the COT that affected underthrust thinned continental crust and serpentinized exhumed mantle at the central part of the margin, and underthrust oceanic crust at its western corner. Thus, it represents an ideal setting for investigating the role of basement type on the formation and distribution of contractional tectonic structures prior to and during underthrusting at magma-poor margins. Based on 2D seismic reflection profiles, we describe the structure of thrusts sheets overlying transitional basement, consisting of highly thinned crust and serpentinized exhumed mantle, and oceanic crust. Our observations support the preservation of an accretionary prism overlying incipiently subducted oceanic crust. Contrastingly, large thrusts led to overthrusting of thinned continental crust and possibly serpentinized exhumed mantle resulting in crustal thickening, landward tilting and uplift of the crust and overlying sediments. Discrete thrusts deformed the upper ultra-thinned basement, leading to the deposition of wider syn-orogenic sediments. We integrate our structural observations with previous numerical and geophysical models to discuss underthrusting vs intraplate deformation and localisation vs distribution of contractional deformation along thinned continental crust and serpentinized exhumed mantle at the onset of convergence. This work is supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 895895 funded by the European Union´s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, the projects ASTRACAN, Ref. PID2021-123116NB and ATLANTIS, Ref. PID2021-124553OB-I00 from the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain, and the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, FCT, I.P./MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC): UID/50019/2025, UIDB/50019/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/50019/2020) and LA/P/0068/2020 https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0068/2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→