MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408428592 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13606

SubMachine ORFEUS integration: Web-based tools for exploring seismic tomography models

2025· preprint· en· W4408428592 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Tsekhmistrenko, Kasra Hosseini, Karin Sigloch, Grace E. Shephard, Mathew Domeier, Kara J. Matthews

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsSeismologyGeologyWeb applicationTomographyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SubMachine is a collection of web-based tools for the interactive visualisation, analysis, and quantitative comparison of global-scale datasets of the Earth's interior [1]. It focuses on making regional and global seismic tomography models easily accessible to the wider solid Earth community to facilitate collaborative exploration. Over 30 tomography models can be visualised and explored—individually, side-by-side, or through statistical and averaging tools. SubMachine also serves diverse non-tomographic datasets, including plate reconstruction models, normal mode observations, global crustal structure, shear wave splitting, geoid, marine gravity, vertical gravity gradients, and global topography in adjustable degrees of spherical harmonic resolution.To ensure continuity beyond the DEEP TIME ERC project [2], SubMachine is transitioning to a new home within ORFEUS (Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology, http://orfeus-eu.org/). This transition secures SubMachine’s long-term sustainability and further integrates it into the broader seismological research infrastructure.In preparation for this move, SubMachine has undergone significant modernization. The entire platform has been migrated to Python 3.12. The transition from Basemap to Cartopy enhances long-term stability, though some projections may experience slower performance. New features include cross-sections through vote maps [3]. These advancements, along with various performance improvements, position SubMachine as a more robust and sustainable resource for the geoscience community.[1] Hosseini, K., Matthews, K. J., Sigloch, K., Shephard, G. E., Domeier, M., & Tsekhmistrenko, M. (2018). SubMachine: Web-Based Tools for Exploring Seismic Tomography and Other Models of Earth's Deep Interior. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19(5), 1464-1483.[2] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/833275[3] Shephard, G. E., Matthews, K. J., Hosseini, K., & Domeier, M. (2017). On the consistency of seismically imaged lower mantle slabs. Scientific reports, 7(1), 10976.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→