Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is an enormous potential for geothermal energy to address the issues of energy security and greenhouse gas emissions. Much of this potential remains undeveloped, in part due to concerns about the interface of geothermal energy development with other subsurface uses. In the deep subsurface, geothermal energy targets may overlap with existing oil and gas developments or areas that could be used for carbon storage and sequestration or production of other resources, such as lithium or helium. In the shallow subsurface, geothermal energy developments may overlap with groundwater resources that are critical water supplies and/or have important environmental functions. There is also the potential for shallow geothermal energy developments to interact with other subsurface infrastructure. These interactions in both the deep and shallow subsurface are likely to be problematic under projections of geothermal energy potential that have not considered other subsurface uses. New approaches to subsurface management that consider energy security, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and water security using a range of possible developments may provide a clearer vision to develop the world’s geothermal resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".