MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408429189 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14533

Status of the TEMPO total ozone and ozone profile data products: A comprehensive validation using various satellites and ground-based observations

2025· preprint· en· W4408429189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiong Liu, Junsung Park

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOzoneEnvironmental scienceGround Level OzoneMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesRemote sensingGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) is part of the global geostationary air quality monitoring constellation. It is the first satellite instrument in geostationary orbit dedicated to monitor air pollutants across North America. Its observational coverage extends from Mexico City to the Canadian oil sands and from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific, with hourly measurements at a resolution approaching neighborhood scale. Following its successful launch in April 2023, TEMPO began nominal operations in October 2023. TEMPO L2 data products (NO2, HCHO, Cloud and total ozone) were made publicly available in May 2024, following the release of Level 1 data in February 2024. As of December 2024, these products have been classified as the Provisional maturity level.This presentation highlights the evaluation of the TEMPO total ozone (O3TOT) product and introduces improvements to the TEMPO ozone profile (O3PROF) product. We present a comparative analysis of total ozone columns (TOCs) from TEMPO observations against data from other satellite instruments, such as OMPS, OMI, and TROPOMI, as well as ground-based measurements from Pandora, Brewer, and Dobson instruments. Additionally, we present enhancements to the TEMPO O3PROF algorithm, particularly the empirical correction, which is scheduled for release this year. Furthermore, we compare TEMPO tropospheric ozone columns with those from EPIC, OMI, and TROPOMI satellites. Lastly, the TEMPO O3PROF product is evaluated using ground-based observations, including data from the Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Network (TOLNet) and ozonesonde observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→