MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408430652 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13913

Solar Orbiter's Comprehensive Solar Energetic Electron event Catalogue (CoSEE-Cat): a new resource for studying particle acceleration and transport in the heliosphere

2025· preprint· en· W4408430652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Warmuth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeliosphereOrbiterPhysicsParticle accelerationEvent (particle physics)AccelerationSolar windSolar energetic particlesCoronal mass ejectionParticle (ecology)Atmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceAstrophysicsAstronomyNuclear physicsPlasmaGeologyClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a comprehensive catalogue of solar energetic electron (SEE) events, derived from joint observations by remote-sensing and in-situ instruments aboard the Solar Orbiter spacecraft. The Energetic Particle Detector (EPD) is used to characterise the properties of energetic electrons in situ and to estimate their injection times at the Sun. The timing, location, and intensity of associated X-ray flares is obtained using the Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (STIX), while the Extreme Ultraviolet Imager (EUI) provides complementary observations of the flare evolution and eruptive phenomena. The Solar Orbiter coronagraph (Metis) and heliospheric imager (SoloHI) are employed to characterise potential associated coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Type III radio bursts detected by the Radio and Plasma Waves (RPW) instrument are used to connect the eruptive solar events to the SEE events observed in situ. We present the catalogue's contents, and the methodology employed to determine key parameters. Finally, we discuss statistical results from the catalogue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207