MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408431375 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13315

Harnessing AI and Decentralized Networks for Next-Generation Geophysical Forecasting

2025· preprint· en· W4408431375 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel Moraga, Steven Hristopoulos, Noah Pearson Kramer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeophysicsComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing geosciences, aligning perfectly with the themes of session GI2.4 by enabling the analysis of complex, multidimensional datasets and delivering actionable insights at unprecedented scales. This study presents two innovative AI-driven frameworks addressing critical challenges in soil moisture prediction and geomagnetic disturbance forecasting. Both approaches leverage decentralized networks to achieve scalability, foster collaboration, and enhance model performance through continuous refinement by a distributed community of contributors.For soil moisture prediction, our multi-stream base model integrates data from Sentinel-2 (high-resolution spectral imagery), SMAP L4 (volumetric water content), ERA5 (meteorological variables), and SRTM (elevation data). The model predicts surface and rootzone soil moisture with six-hour lead times, achieving RMSE values of 0.1087 m³/m³ and 0.1183 m³/m³, respectively, across diverse Köppen-Geiger climate zones. By utilizing a decentralized network, contributors perform inference on 100 km² global regions, generating predictions evaluated against SMAP data using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and R² metrics. This system ensures robust model performance while addressing the spatial and temporal gaps inherent in traditional observational networks. These advances have significant implications for agriculture, hydrology, and climate modeling, enabling better water resource management, crop planning, and drought mitigation strategies. In geomagnetic disturbance forecasting, our GeoMagModel leverages Prophet, a time-series forecasting library, to predict the Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) index, a key indicator of geomagnetic activity. The model achieves an RMSE of 6.37 for December 2024 datasets, effectively capturing both trend shifts and weekly seasonality. The decentralized community enhances predictive accuracy by dynamically integrating historical and real-time Dst data, which is validated by benchmark predictions of the Kyoto World Data Center’s hourly records. This approach provides near-real-time forecasts critical for safeguarding power grids, satellite systems, and other infrastructure vulnerable to space weather events.By integrating machine learning with decentralized computing and state-of-the-art data sources, these frameworks offer scalable solutions to longstanding challenges in geophysical monitoring. The decentralized network not only improves scalability but also incentivizes the geoscience community to refine baseline models, fostering innovation and enabling systems to outpace state-of-the-art benchmarks. The implications of this work extend beyond immediate applications, paving the way for hybrid models that combine AI-driven predictions with physical process-based simulations. This fusion has the potential to improve understanding and resilience in critical domains such as water resource planning, disaster mitigation, and space weather forecasting. By addressing the limitations of traditional observation systems and delivering actionable insights at scale, these AI-driven frameworks represent a paradigm shift in how we approach and solve complex geoscientific problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207