MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408431499 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13259

Distal Cirque Contribution to the Northern Cordilleran Ice Sheet, Yukon, Canada

2025· preprint· en· W4408431499 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brent Ward, Derek Cronmiller, Jessi Steinke, Jeff Bond

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsGovernment of SaskatchewanYukon Health and Social ServicesYukon UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirqueGeologyIce sheetPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeomorphologyGeographyGlacier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yukon has been repeatedly affected by the northern Cordilleran Ice Sheet (NCIS). Although termed an ice sheet, it is better described as an ice complex, with quasi-independent lobes originating from mountainous areas around the border of Yukon. This ice complex produced irregular, digitate horseshoe-shaped glacial limits largely on the plateau area of central Yukon, at the eastern edge of unglaciated Beringia. These limits have broadly followed a pattern of progressively diminished extent. It is likely that variations in precipitation across the source areas of these lobes affected their extent and timing during various glacial cycles. The growth model of the NCIS is contingent on ice from numerous cirques and ice fields in the source areas eventually amalgamating into these large, coalescent ice lobes. What is unclear is the contribution of cirque and valley glaciers from the few mountainous areas near the limits of glaciation. This research describes the contribution of cirques and valley glaciers in two areas at the glacial limits from MIS 6-2.Central Ruby Range is in southwest Yukon and was affected by the Saint Elias lobe. It encompasses the limits of MIS 2, 4 and 6 glaciations. Stratigraphic analysis paired with 10Be surface exposure dating indicates extensive local ice production from cirques and plateau surfaces during MIS 2. During early MIS 2, local valley glaciers advance to the edge of the range but had retreated before inundation by the St. Elias lobe, likely due to local precipitation reduction. These alpine ice centres were responsive to deglacial climatic fluctuations and hosted significant re-advances during the Older Dryas, despite their location in the rain shadow of the St. Elias Mountains and during rapid retreat of the St. Elias Lobe. The MIS 4 limit is slightly more extensive than the MIS 6 limit here, likely because local ice contributed to this portion of the St. Elias Lobe. The record and limit of the MIS 6 glaciation is poorly constrained here but 150 km to the NW, MIS 6 is 4 km more extensive than 4.Granite Creek is in the Gustavus Range in central Yukon at the MIS 2 limit of the Selwyn lobe. During MIS 2 a tongue of the Selwyn lobe occupied the lower portion of Granite Creek, forming a lake. Cirque glaciers near the margin were overrun by the Selwyn lobe. Cirque glaciers terminating in the lake advanced due to floating ice margins, but these maximum limits are not reflected in the geomorphic record; their well-defined moraines are recessional from this maximum. Stratigraphic studies indicate extensive MIS 4 cirque glaciation but no evidence of a proximal Selwyn lobe. During MIS 6, cirque glaciers were extensive early enough that the Selwyn lobe did not inundate local cirque valleys even though the entire area was overrun.This research indicates peripheral ice accumulation could contribute to the NCIS. However, variations in precipitation imply that peripheral ice sources were largely out of sync with local ice sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→