MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408432325 · doi:10.1590/acb402525

Public health system expenditure on motor vehicle collisions in Brazil: an ecological study

2025· article· en· W4408432325 on OpenAlexaff
Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Ayla Gerk, Sofia Schmitt Schlindwein, Enzzo Barrozo Marrazzo, Brenda Feres, Lívia Ribeiro, Madeleine Carroll, David Mooney, Gabriel Schnitman, Cristina Pires Camargo

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Cirúrgica Brasileira · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averagePer capitaEnvironmental healthEcological studyGeographyPopulationRegression analysisPublic healthInjury preventionMedicineDemographyPoison controlSocioeconomicsTime seriesStatisticsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess the cost of traffic accidents in Brazil and the impact of age/location. METHODS: All patients admitted to a Brazilian hospital due to traffic accidents from January 2012 to December 2022 and cost of hospital services were obtained from the Department of Information Technology of the Unified Health System. Demographic data were collected in the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics database. Parametric and nonparametric data were analyzed. The Kruskal-Wallis' test and a post-hoc test were used for data comparison. The ARIMA linear regression method for trend estimation. RESULTS: In Brazil, 1.6 million individuals were involved in traffic accidents between 2012-2022, resulting in a cumulative hospital expenditure of US$ 38 million. The average hospital admission cost during this time was US$ 239.66, but no correlation was found between the cost per capita and driver population density increase. Hospitalization in the Midwest/South was higher. CONCLUSION: The economic impact of traffic accidents on the Brazilian public health system is significant. With a high number of victims admitted annually and evident regional and age-related disparities, there is a clear need for comprehensive and cost-effective healthcare strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Cirúrgica BrasileiraSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207