MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408433089 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-12028

Provenance analyses: a tool to constrain tectonic changes. Parallelism between the ancient Yukon-Koyukuk Basin (Alaska) and modern Southeast Asia.

2025· preprint· en· W4408433089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simone Seminara, Victoria Pease, Jaime Toro, Jenny Omma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProvenanceStructural basinTectonicsParallelism (grammar)GeologySoutheast asiaCentral asiaPaleontologyEarth scienceArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeographyAncient historyHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present heavy minerals, detrital zircon data and U-Pb tuff ages from the sedimentary units of the Yukon-Koyukuk Basin (YKB) in Alaska, to investigate and understand its evolution within a tectonic framework. Two basins in Southeast Asia, with similar tectonic settings, serve as modern analogues for comparison. The YKB started to form in middle to late Jurassic after the collision between an intraoceanic volcanic arc and the Arctic Alaska margin, which eventually led to the thrusting of the oceanic basement over the passive continental margin. The basin is flanked by the metamorphic rocks of the Seward Peninsula to the west, the Brooks Range to the north and the Ruby Terrane to the east.Our results are from the whole stratigraphic column of the basin, from the lowermost Kv unit to the uppermost Ks unit:Kv unit: basaltic and andesitic lava flows interbedded with volcanogenic sediments. K-Ar ages vary from 134 Ma and 118 Ma. A single U-Pb zircon age from a tuff is about 138 Ma. Kvg unit: volcaniclastic greywacke with Albian molluscs are interbedded with tuffaceous layers. Two of these are dated at 112 Ma and 110 Ma (Albian). Kmc unit: conglomerate and greywacke with a strong mafic and calcareous imprint. Cretaceous molluscs are widespread. Kqc unit: quartz rich deposits with plant fossils of Cretaceous age. Ks+Kms units: late Cretaceous fluvial to shallow marine and deep marine sandstone and shale layers. We use QEMSCAN® (Quantitative Evaluation of Minerals by Scanning Electron Microscopy) for heavy mineral (HM) analysis, which, along with point counting, petrographic description, paleocurrent data and sedimentary features analysis, helps to constrain sediment provenance. Kv is the only unit reflecting a volcanic source, while the others display the progressive unroofing of the deeper and higher-grade metamorphic rocks surrounding the basin. U-Pb SIMS dating of tuffs and detrital zircons provide, for the first time, an absolute chronology for basin evolution.The combined data indicate the YKB formed in a forearc/backarc setting prior to 138 Ma (deposition of the volcanic-rich Kv unit). With the progressive denudation of the Brooks Range, sedimentation shifted towards greater metamorphic input, leading to the deposition of the Kvg unit at 110 Ma. Ultimately, after the Late Cretaceous uplift of the Ruby Terrane, the main sediment source changed again, and the stratigraphically higher units were deposited from the Cenomanian to at least the Maastrichtian. The Savu Sea and the Taiwan margin in Southeast Asia show similarities in structure, metamorphic grade, sediment composition and tectonic setting, suggesting these are effective modern analogues that can enhance our understanding of both ancient and modern arc-continent collisional systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→