MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408433523 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-11910

Can cadmium be used as another proxy for volcanism?

2025· preprint· en· W4408433523 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen E. Grasby

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolcanismProxy (statistics)Earth scienceGeologyGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceSeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary source of Cadmium (Cd) to the environment is volcanic emissions, emitted to the atmosphere in a wide range of particle size and chemical compounds that are easily dispersed by wind. Higher temperature emission sources also release elemental gaseous Cd that then cools and becomes bound to ash particles. Atmospheric transport of volcanic Cd emissions is a function of particle size as well as plume height, with transport of thousands of km possible. In the modern, Cd anomalies in Antarctic ice records are shown to be sourced from long-range transport of volcanic emissions, and Cd anomalies found in Greenland ice cores are shown to be generated by the Laki and Hekla eruptions.When deposited into oceans Cd is highly soluble and has vertical concentration profiles strongly similar to those of nutrients (e.g. P), suggesting that despite its toxicity to higher life Cd acts as a nutrient for phytoplankton by replacing the Zn cofactor in the enzyme carbonic anhydrase under Zn limited conditions. Cd is exported to sediment as organic matter (OM) bound metal and is subsequently buried or fixed as insoluble Cd sulfide.Studies of Cd in the geologic record are limited and tend to be focused on use of Cd as an indicator of nutrient levels or paleo-environmental conditions. Enhanced Cd concentrations have also been related to increased drawdown during ocean anoxic events (OAEs) related to enhanced OM preservation and the strong affinity of Cd for sulfide as well as an indicator of basin restriction. Examination of use as a proxy for volcanism has been limited.Records of Cd levels in sediments deposited during Oceanic Anoxic Event 3 in Arctic Canada, show that at low concentrations (< 10 ppm) Cd has a negative correlation with Zn, consistent with Zn replacement. In contrast, at Cd concentrations above 10 ppm there is strong positive correlation with Zn, suggests a common source enriching both metals. Above 10 ppm, Cd concentrations also show a strong correlation with heulandite, a low temperature alteration product of volcanic glass, suggesting a volcanic origin. This is consistent with abundant bentonite beds with geochemical markers consistent with arc volcanism. This may explain the anomalous high Cd concentrations in late Cretaceous mudstones of northern Canada, and suggest that Cd could be another geochemical marker for enhanced volcanism. However, use of Cd may be more nuanced than other geochemical makers, such as Hg or Te, given its nutrient like properties.These high Cd levels in OAE3 sediments contaminate surface and groundwaters in the modern, with linkage to human health issues, showing long term impact of volcanism on the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→