BERT-AmPEP60: A BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach to Predict the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Antimicrobial Peptides for <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a promising alternative for combating bacterial drug resistance. While current computer prediction models excel at binary classification of AMPs based on sequences, there is a lack of regression methods to accurately quantify AMP activity against specific bacteria, making the identification of highly potent AMPs a challenge. Here, we present a deep learning method, BERT-AmPEP60, based on the fine-tuned Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) architecture to extract embedding features from input sequences. Using the transfer learning strategy, we built regression models to predict the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of peptides for Escherichia coli (EC) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA). In five independent experiments with 10% leave-out sequences as the test sets, the optimal EC and SA models outperformed the state-of-the-art regression method and traditional machine learning methods, achieving an average mean squared error of 0.2664 and 0.3032 (log μM), respectively. They also showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7955 and 0.7530, and a Kendall correlation coefficient of 0.5797 and 0.5222, respectively. Our models outperformed existing deep learning and machine learning methods that rely on conventional sequence features. This work underscores the effectiveness of utilizing BERT with transfer learning for training quantitative AMP prediction models specific for different bacterial species. The web server of BERT-AmPEP60 can be found at https://app.cbbio.online/ampep/home . To facilitate development, the program source codes are available at https://github.com/janecai0714/AMP_regression_EC_SA .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".