MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408434702 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7891

Lithosphere Extension Prior to Continental Breakup in the South China Sea: Comparison with the Atlantic Type Rifted Margin

2025· preprint· en· W4408434702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Zhang, Nick Kusznir, Giänreto Manatschal, Pauline Chenin, Brian Taylor, Zhen Sun, Sanzhong Li, Yanhui Suo, Zhongxian Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLithosphereContinental marginNeckingPassive marginBreakupSeafloor spreadingContinental crustCrustRiftOceanic crustMantle (geology)SeismologyPetrologyPaleontologySubductionTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total continental lithosphere extension prior to breakup and sea-floor spreading in the South China Sea (SCS), a marginal ocean basin, ranges from approximately 360 km in the NE to 580 km in the SW. In contrast, total continental lithosphere extension prior to breakup for the Iberia-Newfoundland rifted margins is no more than 180km. SCS extension leading to continental breakup is between x2 and x3 greater than for the Atlantic margin type.In the case of Atlantic type margins, lithosphere deformation transitions from initially wide rifting to more localised stretching and thinning, a process termed necking. The necking domain at rifted continental margins, so produced, typically has crustal thickness of 25 km proximally decreasing to 10 km distally. Further lithosphere stretching and thinning due to hyper-extension and the onset of decompression melting results in the rupture and separation of continental lithosphere, the creation of a divergent plate boundary, and the initiation of sea-floor spreading.The SCS shows very wide domains of thinned continental crust with thicknesses between 25 and 10 km; widths of thinned crust much greater than those of Atlantic type margins. These wide regions of thinned crust on the SCS margin take the form of crustal boudinage with multiple sag basins underlain by highly thinned crust separated by basement highs underlain by less thinned crust.The localisation of lithosphere deformation before breakup, during the formation of Atlantic type margins, is due to failure of the initially strong cold lithospheric mantle lid. The same mechanism of localisation cannot occur to generate necking in the SCS; the SCS was formed by rifting of volcanic arc lithosphere in which the lithospheric mantle was already hot.We attribute the very wide regions of continental crust with thicknesses between 25 and 10 km in the SCS, very much wider than for Atlantic type margins, to a weak inherited lithosphere rheology which favours extensional boudinage of the continental crust rather than crustal rupture and separation, and distributed rather than focused decompression melting of wet mantle from the inherited volcanic arc setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207