MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408435676 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7365

Weakening of the AMOC and Strengthening of Labrador Sea Deep Convection in Response to External Freshwater Forcing

2025· preprint· en· W4408435676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xinyue Wei, Rong Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForcing (mathematics)ClimatologyDeep convectionConvectionGeologyOceanographyGeographyEnvironmental scienceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection was often thought to play an important role in AMOC changes. For example, in some previous water hosing experiments, the prescribed external freshwater flux is released broadly and covers the entire subpolar North Atlantic, which causes the weakening and shutdown of the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection and associated subsurface warming. The simulated subsurface warming over the subpolar North Atlantic due to the shutdown of the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection further drives the AMOC weakening. However, the importance of the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection in the AMOC has been challenged by theoretical, modeling, and observational analyses. In this study, an ensemble of water hosing experiments is conducted to examine mechanisms of AMOC weakening and its subsequent impact on the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection. The results show that the subpolar AMOC decline in response to the external freshwater flux released over the southern Nordic Sea is dominated by that across the eastern subpolar North Atlantic, and the largest subpolar AMOC decline is at the relatively dense level. The AMOC decline is associated with subsurface cooling in the subpolar North Atlantic and the decline in the deep ocean west–east density contrast across the subpolar basin. Contrary to previous studies showing that the AMOC decline is caused by subsurface warming through the shutdown of the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection, our results reveal a novel response, i.e., a strengthening of the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection, which is not a cause of the AMOC decline. We illustrate the key mechanisms causing the strengthening in the Labrador Sea open-ocean deep convection and the relationship with the AMOC weakening. This convection strengthening is mainly due to the relatively stronger freshening in the deep Labrador Sea associated with the freshening/weakening of the Iceland-Scotland Overflow, and thus reduced vertical stratification in the central Labrador Sea.Wei, X., & Zhang, R. (2024). Weakening of the AMOC and strengthening of Labrador Sea deep convection in response to external freshwater forcing. Nature Communications, 15(1), 10357.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→