MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408436303 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7423

Influence of past and future atmospheric and oceanic climate change on groundwater levels, recharge, discharge, and salinity

2025· preprint· en· W4408436303 on OpenAlexaffabout
Barret L. Kurylyk, Nicole K. LeRoux, H. Bay Berry, Armita Motamedi, R.B. Strong, Ryan Malley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeClimate changeEnvironmental scienceSalinityGroundwaterHydrology (agriculture)ClimatologyOceanographyGeologyAquiferGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric climate change in cold regions can impact groundwater resources through alterations to snow-rain partitioning, mid-winter thaws, and evapotranspiration. Also, sea-level rise can drive elevated coastal water tables and saltwater intrusion, which can deleteriously impact coastal groundwater resources and coastal infrastructure. We investigate these processes in the coastal province of Nova Scotia, Canada, where 40% of the population relies on vulnerable private wells. We consider impacts of past climate change by conducting statistical analyses of hydrometeorological data and find that late-summer significant negative trends are apparent in net precipitation, groundwater levels, and groundwater discharge (baseflow). To assess the impacts of future climate change we are developing province-wide coastal groundwater vulnerability maps (salinization and water table rise) based on a coastal groundwater analytical solution parameterized and forced with geospatial data. We are also using downscaled climate projections to drive a physically-based hydrologic model to investigate how groundwater recharge may respond to changing temperature and precipitation in different hydrologic response units. Our preliminary results provide critical insights into the impacts of climate change on groundwater resources and lay the foundation for better risk identification to underpin sustainable groundwater management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→