MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408437774 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-7228

Towards a synthesis of perceptual models of dominant hydrologic processes across North America

2025· preprint· en· W4408437774 on OpenAlexaff
Wouter Knoben, Ying Fan, Irene Garousi-Nejad, Julia Masterman, Hilary McMillan, Jordan S. Read, Katie van Werkhoven, M. Diane Clark

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionHydrological modellingEnvironmental scienceGeographyComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementGeologyPsychologyClimatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is increasing recognition that providing robust assessments of future water resource availability and water-related risks requires the use of the right models in the right places. Traditionally, selecting or developing an appropriate model for a given basin was possible based on thorough understanding of the dominant hydrologic processes in the basin under consideration. On national, continental, and global scales however, the commonly used method so far has been a “one model fits all” approach. This is in part due to the lack of a comprehensive overview of how dominant hydrologic processes vary across large geographical domains.Here we introduce a community-driven synthesis effort to address this large-scale hydrologic challenge, focusing on North America as a test case. Over the past half year, we have convened multiple virtual workshops and organized several in-person opportunities to bring together water science experts working in various regions across the continent. The workshops covered five key parts of the continent (the densely populated East and West coasts, the center region used for agriculture, the northern regions that are particularly vulnerable to climate change, and the tropical islands). Invited speakers shared their knowledge, experience, and expertise around the dominant hydrologic processes and existing modeling efforts in these regions. These were followed by structured discussion among the workshop attendees, as well as during dedicated further interactions later, to divide the continent into a manageable number of hydrologic landscapes and to define representative perceptual models of hydrologic behavior for the various parts of each larger region. Here we present an overview of these resulting perceptual models and invite further discussion. Ultimately, these perceptual models can be mapped onto computational models, modules and individual equations, and so support a theory-based large-scale effort to develop the most appropriate hydrologic model for any location in the wider North American domain. The methodology used is not unique to the North American context and similar approaches could be used elsewhere where large-scale synthesis of hydrologic process understanding is desired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207