Geomorphic and climate-driven vegetation dynamics in badlands – A case study from Laval catchment, Draix-Bléone critical zone observatory, SE France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Badlands are characterized by highly eroded, rugged landscapes with steep slopes, limited vegetation, and significant soil degradation. In badlands, vegetation plays a key role in erosion mitigation by intercepting runoff and acting as a significant factor in soil stability. However, vegetation dynamics in such an environment are determined by geomorphological factors like slope, erosion, sediment flux, and climatic conditions, characterized by temperature and precipitation patterns.This study evaluates the significance of such drivers of vegetation transition within the badland systems using a State-and-Transition Model (STM) approach. This model predicts vegetation dynamics as a function of two basic processes: extinction (loss of vegetation) and colonization (vegetation growth over a barren patch of land). It is forced with vegetation states at four different time points (i.e., 1982, 1994, 2015, and 2021), while climate variables (e.g., temperature and precipitation), and sediment fluxes are averaged for the periods between these states. Geomorphological parameters (i.e., topographic elevation and slope) are assumed to be constant throughout the simulation period. It estimates vegetation transition probabilities using logistic regression. The model parameters are optimized through Bayesian methods (i.e., Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm) for climate conditions and geomorphology in the Laval catchment in the Draix-Bléone critical zone observatory, southeastern France. Model performance is quantified through repetitive training and testing to ensure the soundness of the predictions.The results indicate that colonization is negatively impacted by higher slopes and annual sediment fluxes and is supported by increasing mean annual temperatures and summer precipitation. In contrast, vegetation extinction is driven mainly by geomorphic disturbances (e.g., slope and sediment fluxes during extreme events), while climatic factors seem to have little impact on vegetation extinction in this study area. Indeed, the forward prediction model, initiated using the 1982 vegetation state with best-fit parameters as forcing, resulted in a reasonably close match of the predicted states to the conditions observed, i.e., those of 1994, 2015, and 2021, which had an accuracy of ~0.8, with uncertainties of around ~0.35.The present study integrates both geomorphological and climatic data to develop valid interpretations concerning environmental factors responsible for vegetation dynamics within badland topography, adding to an improved understanding of the ecosystem dynamics of these sensitive environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".