MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408441228 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3841

SeParation of Ice Nuclei via Density Layers (SPINDL): A new method for characterizing ice nuclei using density gradient centrifugation

2025· preprint· en· W4408441228 on OpenAlexaff
Gurcharan K. Uppal, Soleil E. Worthy, Lanxiadi Chen, Olenna McConville, Allan K. Bertram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDensity gradientIce nucleusIce formationMaterials scienceChemistryChromatographyPhysicsAtmospheric sciencesThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric ice nucleating substances (INSs) play a crucial role in ice cloud formation above -35°C, impacting cloud radiative properties, cloud lifetime, and the hydrological cycle. Characterizing inorganic (e.g., mineral dusts, volcanic ash, metals) and organic (e.g., bacterial cells, fungal spores, pollen, and various biomacromolecules) INSs has typically involved: 1) single-particle analyses, which offer high resolution but require specialized equipment, and 2) bulk sample treatment (e.g., heat, H2O2, (NH₄)₂SO₄) analyses, which are more accessible but may overestimate or underestimate INS concentrations due to non-target effects. There is a need for additional methods to quantify inorganic and organic INSs concentrations in the atmosphere to test and improve climate models.Here we show a new density gradient centrifugation method to differentiate and quantify inorganic (densities ≥ 2.1 g cm-3) and organic INSs (densities ≤ 1.6 g cm-3). Density gradient centrifugation was used to separate the INSs suspension into their respective density isolate. This was followed by a wash procedure consisting of sequential differential centrifugation and ultrafiltration. Lastly, the INSs were quantified using a droplet freezing assay.Our method successfully recovered organic water-soluble INSs (lignin, birch pollen washing water and filtered Fusarium acuminatum) and organic water-insoluble INSs (Snomax and Pseudomonas syringae) in the low-density isolate. We recovered inorganic water-insoluble INSs (K-feldspar) in the high-density isolate. In an INS mixed suspension, we recovered K-feldspar in the high-density isolate and lignin in the low-density isolate both at concentrations similar to the isolated K-feldspar or lignin tests. This work demonstrates the broad applicability of density gradient centrifugation for characterizing a wide range of inorganic and organic atmospheric INSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207