MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408441362 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-3604

The Atlantic overturning circulation (AMOC) ceases in many CMIP6 projections after 2

2025· preprint· en· W4408441362 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefan Rahmstorf, Sybren Drijfhout, Joran Angevaare, Jennifer Mecking

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculation (fluid dynamics)ClimatologyGeologyPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New global warming projections in CMIP6 contain extensions beyond year 2100 up to 2300/2500. The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) in these runs essentially ceases in all models forced by a high emissions (SSP585) scenario and sometimes also in models forced by intermediate (SSP245) or low (SSP126) scenarios. These extremely weak overturning states merely maintain a wind-driven shallow overturning at depths less than 200 m. Northward mass transport below this maximum is either completely absent or less than 2 Sverdrup. In all cases, this AMOC cessation is preceded by a mid-21st century collapse of deep convection in Labrador, Irminger and Nordic Seas, which likely represents the tipping point triggering the terminal AMOC decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207