QoE-Aware Volumetric Video Caching and Rendering for Mobile Extended Reality Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we propose a novel volumetric video caching and rendering approach for an edge-assisted extended reality (XR) system to enhance user Quality of Experience (QoE). Particularly, user QoE consists of visual quality and quality variation. Different quality of volumetric videos are required to be cached, rendered, and delivered to XR devices for different viewing distances within a time latency. Given the limited caching, computing, and communication resources on the edge server, we formulate a long-term user QoE maximization problem to jointly optimize video caching and rendering by considering user locations and viewing distances. To solve this problem, we first design an online optimization algorithm in which caching decisions are obtained using a regularization technique. We then develop a low-complexity binary search algorithm to determine optimal rendering quality. Extensive simulations are conducted to demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms benchmark schemes by an average 46% improvement in terms of long-term user QoE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".