MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408443984 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1598

Direct cooling of the atmosphere by heat transfer

2025· preprint· en· W4408443984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRanque-Hilsch vortex tube
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmosphere (unit)Heat transferEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

So far, attempts to mitigate global warming have been based exclusively on the reduction of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. That of course eliminates the root cause of global warming. However, one of the problems with this approach is that the lifetime of CO2 in the atmosphere is very long and the effect of the CO2 emission reduction on atmospheric temperature decrease will only become meaningful after many decades.In this work I propose to reduce or even eliminate the increase of global surface air temperature (GSAT) by removing sensible heat from the atmosphere and transferring it to media outside the atmosphere such as water or land mass. One of the main advantages of atmospheric heat removal is that unlike CO2 emission reduction, it has an immediate effect on atmospheric temperature. Also, the proposed technical solutions for heat removal from the atmosphere are simple, inexpensive, and well developed.Usually, the first reaction to my proposed solution is: You cannot mitigate global warming by transferring heat from one medium to another! Actually, I propose to mitigate just the atmospheric global warming which currently is the main cause of climatic devastation. The atmospheric heat will be transferred to a heat sink (the ocean and/or land) having at least 1000 times larger heat capacity; the heating effect of the heat sink will be negligible, as shown in my work.Another question is: would heat transfer to the ocean cause change its temperature and/or ocean currents? Currently, our society dumps 0.25 ZJ/year of heat to water (ocean and inland), which is almost twice the amount (0.13 ZJ/year) needed to transfer to the ocean to stop atmospheric global warming. And the current anthropogenic heat input to water is not considered a climate change or ocean change factor at all, for example by the IPCC.Warming of the ocean surface is another potential question. My work shows a method of transferring heat to the ocean without increasing its surface temperature at all. The only parameter that will change is the increase of mixed layer by 3 cm/year.In order to stop global warming of the atmosphere, i.e., to flatten the GSAT vs. time curve, the total cost of the heat exchangers for 10 000 atmospheric cooling stations, located around the globe, is expected to be as low as $8.4 Billion. The area required for each cooling station will be between 0.01 and 0.5 km2.The main disadvantage of direct atmospheric cooling is that it cannot be used indefinitely. Heat sinks cannot be heated for more than 5-10 decades to avoid overheating. Therefore, the proposed method will act as a “bridge” between now and the time when carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions are drastically reduced, when carbon capture and storage becomes meaningful on a planetary scale, and/or until technology for the transport of long-wave electromagnetic energy to space is developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRanque-Hilsch vortex tubeFrench-language works237,207