Notice bibliographique
Résumé
So far, attempts to mitigate global warming have been based exclusively on the reduction of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. That of course eliminates the root cause of global warming. However, one of the problems with this approach is that the lifetime of CO2 in the atmosphere is very long and the effect of the CO2 emission reduction on atmospheric temperature decrease will only become meaningful after many decades.In this work I propose to reduce or even eliminate the increase of global surface air temperature (GSAT) by removing sensible heat from the atmosphere and transferring it to media outside the atmosphere such as water or land mass. One of the main advantages of atmospheric heat removal is that unlike CO2 emission reduction, it has an immediate effect on atmospheric temperature. Also, the proposed technical solutions for heat removal from the atmosphere are simple, inexpensive, and well developed.Usually, the first reaction to my proposed solution is: You cannot mitigate global warming by transferring heat from one medium to another! Actually, I propose to mitigate just the atmospheric global warming which currently is the main cause of climatic devastation. The atmospheric heat will be transferred to a heat sink (the ocean and/or land) having at least 1000 times larger heat capacity; the heating effect of the heat sink will be negligible, as shown in my work.Another question is: would heat transfer to the ocean cause change its temperature and/or ocean currents? Currently, our society dumps 0.25 ZJ/year of heat to water (ocean and inland), which is almost twice the amount (0.13 ZJ/year) needed to transfer to the ocean to stop atmospheric global warming. And the current anthropogenic heat input to water is not considered a climate change or ocean change factor at all, for example by the IPCC.Warming of the ocean surface is another potential question. My work shows a method of transferring heat to the ocean without increasing its surface temperature at all. The only parameter that will change is the increase of mixed layer by 3 cm/year.In order to stop global warming of the atmosphere, i.e., to flatten the GSAT vs. time curve, the total cost of the heat exchangers for 10 000 atmospheric cooling stations, located around the globe, is expected to be as low as $8.4 Billion. The area required for each cooling station will be between 0.01 and 0.5 km2.The main disadvantage of direct atmospheric cooling is that it cannot be used indefinitely. Heat sinks cannot be heated for more than 5-10 decades to avoid overheating. Therefore, the proposed method will act as a “bridge” between now and the time when carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions are drastically reduced, when carbon capture and storage becomes meaningful on a planetary scale, and/or until technology for the transport of long-wave electromagnetic energy to space is developed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».