MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408444756 · doi:10.1186/s13550-025-01215-9

Heart ketone metabolism under acute ketone supplementation in ZDF rats, a type 2 diabetes heart failure model

2025· article· en· W4408444756 on OpenAlexafffund
Étienne Croteau, Gabriel Richard, Patrick Prud’Homme, Étienne Rousseau, Stephen C. Cunnane, Véronique Dumulon‐Perreault, Otman Sarrhini, Serge Phoenix, Sébastien Tremblay, Brigitte Guérin, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

VenueEJNMMI Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureKetone bodiesInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesKetoneCardiologyEndocrinologyMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In non-insulin-dependent, type 2, diabetes mellitus (T2D), glucose metabolism is compromised, and the heart loses its metabolic flexibility. The Zucker Diabetic Fatty rat (ZDF) model, which replicates the pathophysiology of T2D in patients, shows that as T2D progresses so does heart failure. Heart ketone metabolism seems to play a role in mitigating the heart failure process. This study assesses ketone metabolism in a ZDF heart failure model using cardiac PET imaging. Six lean ZDF rats (CTRL) and six diabetic obese ZDF rats (T2D) were evaluated for coronary flow reserve (CFR) using [13N]ammonia ([13N]NH3) cardiac PET. In addition, rats were evaluated with [11C]acetoacetate ([11C]AcAc) PET during rest and stress conditions to assess ketone metabolism, both at baseline and under an acute exogenous ketone ester oral supplementation. Blood chemistry, cardiac function and hemodynamic parameters were also evaluated under these conditions. CFR was impaired in the T2D model (CTRL: 1.8 ± 0.5; T2D: 1.4 ± 0.2, p < 0.05) suggesting the development of heart failure in the T2D model. Blood ketones increased more than 2-fold after supplementation. The [11C]AcAc heart ketone uptake values with and without ketone supplementation were similar for the CTRL group, and these values were higher than for T2D rats. For the T2D group, the uptake decreased by 20% at rest under ketone supplementation vs. no supplementation (p < 0.05) and remained unchanged under stress with and without supplementation. Because of this decrease at rest, the stress/rest ratio after supplementation increases to the level observed in CTRL. [11C]AcAc heart ketone metabolism showed a slight decrease under stress for the CTRL group, but not for the T2D. Under ketone supplementation, the metabolism stress/rest ratio increased only in T2D (1.25 ± 0.29, p = 0.03 compared to baseline). In a rat model of T2D and CFR impairment, we were able to measure changes in ketone metabolism using [11C]AcAc PET at rest and under stress with and without acute ketone supplementation. Our findings suggest that the heart ketone metabolism of T2D rats is impaired during the heart failure process. Ketone supplementation may have the potential to restore this cardiac reserve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEJNMMI ResearchSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207