TRATAMENTO DE REVASCULARIZAÇÃO EM DENTE ADULTO COM REABSORÇÃO APICAL EXTERNA: RELATO DE CASO.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the increase in stem cell research in 1961 by Canadian scientists, advances in studies, research and the development of new treatments with this type of resource have shown promise. The use of stem cells is a great bet for both medicine and regenerative dentistry. The potential of these very special cells lies in two peculiar characteristics: they are capable of multiplying and differentiating into other types of cells, such as tissues, cartilage and neurons. It is in this way that they play a fundamental role in studies and treatments related to regeneration. Endodontic treatment in immature teeth with non-vital pulp (Revascularization) is an efficient method of induction of pulp revitalization through the use of over-instrumentation of the dentin canal, seeking to cause bleeding, collecting in this maneuver a certain amount of stem cells. Teeth diagnosed with incomplete rhizogenesis, affected by trauma or deep caries with pulp necrosis, need to be treated and treated endodontically. We present a Revascularization in an adult patient tooth with external root resorption, relying on the efficiency of stem cells in tissue regeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".