TRATAMENTO DE REVASCULARIZAÇÃO EM DENTE ADULTO COM REABSORÇÃO APICAL EXTERNA: RELATO DE CASO.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the increase in stem cell research in 1961 by Canadian scientists, advances in studies, research and the development of new treatments with this type of resource have shown promise. The use of stem cells is a great bet for both medicine and regenerative dentistry. The potential of these very special cells lies in two peculiar characteristics: they are capable of multiplying and differentiating into other types of cells, such as tissues, cartilage and neurons. It is in this way that they play a fundamental role in studies and treatments related to regeneration. Endodontic treatment in immature teeth with non-vital pulp (Revascularization) is an efficient method of induction of pulp revitalization through the use of over-instrumentation of the dentin canal, seeking to cause bleeding, collecting in this maneuver a certain amount of stem cells. Teeth diagnosed with incomplete rhizogenesis, affected by trauma or deep caries with pulp necrosis, need to be treated and treated endodontically. We present a Revascularization in an adult patient tooth with external root resorption, relying on the efficiency of stem cells in tissue regeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it