MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408445034 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-238

A (tectonic) window of opportunity: crustal architecture and low-temperature geochronology of the NE Attica Peninsula, Greece

2025· preprint· en· W4408445034 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Bakowsky, David Schneider, Bernhard Grasemann, Renelle Dubosq, Taylor Ducharme

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversité LavalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyPeninsulaWindow (computing)GeologyTectonicsArchitecturePaleontologyGeochemistrySeismologyGeographyArchaeologyOperating systemComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miocene extension and crustal thinning in the Aegean were largely accommodated by a bivergent detachment system. The region contains several metamorphic core complexes that have overprinted Eocene high-pressure, low-temperature (HP-LT) metamorphic rocks of the Cycladic Blueschist Unit (CBU). The Attica Peninsula, along the northern margin, hosts the lateral termination of one of the major detachments, the SW-directed West Cycladic Detachment System (WCDS). Moreover, NE Attica has long been thought to contain a large tectonic window exposing the structurally lowest unit of the Attic Cycladic Belt, the Basal Unit. Our new mapping reveals that NE Attica primarily consists of a NE-dipping tectonic nappe of greenschist-retrogressed, HP-LT units, of probable Late Triassic to Late Cretaceous origins. In the west, Upper Cretaceous low-grade or non-metamorphosed units are juxtaposed above the nappe by a NNE-SSW striking, top-to-SW detachment fault. In the east, a package of HP marbles, evinced by calcite pseudomorphs after aragonite, lie above the nappe along a newly discovered NE-dipping fault, the Marathon Thrust. The common footwall of both structures includes isoclinally folded marbles and schists resulting in an apparent map-scale repetition of units. Schists are variably quartzitic to calcitic and contain intercalations of quartzites, metabasites, marble mylonites and, near the stratigraphic top, blue-grey marble. Axial planes of Dn recumbent isoclinal folds (F­n) develop a pervasive, gently NE-dipping Sn foliation (~320°/30°). Syn-metamorphic Fn axes have the same orientation as a NE-SW mineral and stretching lineation (Ln; from 050° to 100°) that forms along the Sn planar fabric. Ln plunges dominantly towards the NE with some variation from subsequent Dn+1 folding. The cooler Dn+1 event is recorded by SW-vergent folds with NW-SE striking Fn+1 axial planes that form an Sn+1 crenulation cleavage, locally defining the main foliation. NW-SE trending Fn+1 axes are parallel to an Ln+1 intersection lineation. Winged inclusions, flanking folds and domino boudinage of dolomite layers within calcitic marbles indicate top-to-SW sense of shear under ductile to brittle-ductile conditions. White mica 40Ar/39Ar (MAr) dates throughout the footwall are earliest Miocene and zircon (U-Th)/He (ZHe) ages are middle Miocene. A several m-thick fault gouge separates the footwall from low-grade metasandstones, limestones and serpentinite bodies in the detachment hanging wall. A narrow zone (10 m) in the immediate hanging wall contains Na-amphibole-rich schists and metabasic blocks with a different HP-LT record than the footwall. MAr dates from the hanging wall are Permian to middle Cretaceous and ZHe dates are early Eocene to middle Miocene. The geochronology from the footwall suggests coeval deformation with the CBU footwall of Mt. Hymittos and correlates the dominant top-to-SW detachment on NE Attica with the WCDS exposed at Mt. Hymittos and S Attica. Together with regional lithostratigraphic correlation, we propose the dominant nappe of NE Attica is CBU, specifically Lower Cycladic Blueschist Nappe, with Pelagonian Zone in the detachment hanging wall. Our reinterpretation is coherent with the classic Cycladic detachment architecture, and consequently limits the exposure of the Basal Unit to the easternmost marble thrust nappe on NE Attica and the Almyropotamos window on Evia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207