MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408445833 · doi:10.1007/s40257-025-00931-1

Long-Term Disease Control and Minimal Disease Activity of Head and Neck Atopic Dermatitis in Patients Treated with Tralokinumab up to 4 Years

2025· article· en· W4408445833 on OpenAlexaff
Raj Chovatiya, Simone Ribero, Andreas Wollenberg, Chang Ook Park, Juan Francisco Silvestre, Hwanhee Hong, Julien Sénéschal, Hidehisa Saeki, Jacob P. Thyssen, Christian Bjerregård Øland, Le Gjerum, Douglas Maslin, Andrew Blauvelt

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersLEO Pharma
KeywordsMedicineAtopic dermatitisDupilumabPharmacotherapyDermatologyPediatricsDiseaseHead and neckDisease controlInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need for long-term atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments that can effectively improve AD involvement of the head and neck (H&N) region (referred to as H&N AD). Tralokinumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin-13, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Recent real-world studies have observed the effectiveness of tralokinumab for H&N AD. Here, data from phase III parent trials, ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, and the long-term extension trial, ECZTEND, were used to assess impacts of long-term tralokinumab treatment on H&N AD and the association between improvements in H&N AD and patient quality of life, and to evaluate whether a proportion of patients developed paradoxical H&N erythema. These post hoc analyses included data from all patients initiated on tralokinumab in ECZTRA 1 or ECZTRA 2. Patients were treated up to 4 years (i.e., up to 52 weeks in ECZTRA 1 or ECZTRA 2 plus up to 152 weeks in ECZTEND). Outcomes included body region subscores of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI; H&N, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Correlations between H&N EASI and DLQI were assessed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ). The incidence of paradoxical H&N erythema (defined as H&N EASI erythema increasing from baseline to a score of 3, while all other regional EASI subscores are 0 or 1, during two or more consecutive visits) was also assessed. Overall, 1192 patients who were initiated on tralokinumab in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, of whom 523 patients opted to continue in ECZTEND, were analyzed. Percentages of patients who had H&N EASI ≤ 1 increased from 12.2% at parent trial baseline to 87.2% by week 152 of ECZTEND. Improvements in EASI subscore outcomes from parent trial baseline were comparable across body regions throughout all timepoints of the study. At parent trial week 16, H&N EASI was moderately correlated with total DLQI (ρ = 0.47), with the strongest numerical correlations observed for DLQI questions regarding skin discomfort (ρ = 0.43) and embarrassment due to skin (ρ = 0.40). During up to 4 years of treatment, seven tralokinumab-treated patients exhibited paradoxical H&N erythema, five of whom improved to absent or mild H&N EASI erythema with continued tralokinumab treatment. Tralokinumab provided progressive and sustained improvements in H&N AD, with H&N EASI 0/1 observed in nearly 90% of patients treated up to 4 years. Improvements in H&N EASI were similar to improvements observed for other body regions and were associated with improvements in patient quality of life, particularly for skin discomfort and self-consciousness/embarrassment due to skin. NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May, 2017; primary completion date: 7 August, 2018; study completion date: 10 October, 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June, 2017; primary completion date: 4 September, 2019; study completion date: 14 August, 2019. NCT03587805 (ECZTEND); study start date: 18 March, 2018; data cut-off date: 30 April, 2022; primary completion date: 3 July, 2024; study completion date: 3 July, 2024. Tralokinumab is an injectable treatment for atopic dermatitis capable of providing long-term disease control in the head and neck region. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that can affect multiple body areas. Atopic dermatitis occurring in the head and neck region (referred to as H&N AD) can be especially burdensome owing in part to its high visibility. Additionally, H&N AD is challenging to treat and may show a lower clinical response to AD treatments than other body areas. Therefore, there is an increased demand for treatments that provide complete/almost complete skin clearance, especially around the face. Tralokinumab is an injectable medication approved for treating moderate-to-severe AD. It has been shown to improve H&N AD in real-world clinical settings. Here, data from phase III parent trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2) and the long-term extension trial (ECZTEND), funded by LEO Pharma A/S, were used to examine the impact of long-term tralokinumab treatment on H&N AD in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated up to 4 years. We found that the severity of H&N AD, including facial redness (i.e., erythema), improved in patients treated with tralokinumab up to 4 years. These improvements in H&N AD were similar to improvements in other body regions and were associated with improvements in patient quality of life, particularly for skin discomfort and self-consciousness/embarrassment due to skin. Worsening or new facial redness has been sometimes observed with certain AD treatments. Very few tralokinumab-treated patients showed increased redness specific to the H&N region compared with other body sites. Most of these cases resolved with continued treatment. Overall, these findings show that tralokinumab effectively treats H&N AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207