Religiusitas dan Quarter-life Crisis pada Dewasa Muda:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah religiusitas berhubungan dengan quarter-life crisis pada dewasa muda, serta apakah intensitas pengunaan media sosial dapat memoderasi hubungan religiusitas dengan quarter-life crisis. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah dewasa muda di Kota Surabaya. Jumlah sampel untuk penelitian ini adalah 350 orang, seperti yang ditetapkan oleh tabel Isaac dan Michael, dengan tingkat kesalahan 5%. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif korelasional, dengan teknik probability sampling. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah skala quarter-life crisis (18 item), skala religiusitas (30 item), dan skala intensitas penggunaan meia sosial (15 item). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan dewasa muda di Surabaya sebanyak 12,00% mengalami quarter-life crisis pada kategori sangat tinggi, 26,29% pada kategori tinggi, 30,86% pada kategori sedang, 24,29% pada kategori rendah dan 6,57% pada kategori sangat rendah. Hasil menunjukkan religiusitas dan quarter-life crisis memiliki hubungan yang negatif, sedangkan intensitas penggunaan media sosial tidak dapat memoderasi hubungan religiusitas dan quarter-life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".