Treatment outcome and associated factors of burn injury in Ethiopian hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Burn injuries impose a substantial burden globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Ethiopia, where the impact is pronounced. Despite existing studies on individual patient data, there 's a lack of synthesized evidence on burn injury mortality in Ethiopia. This study aimed to evaluate the combined prevalence of burn-related mortality and its determinants in Ethiopian hospitals. Methods: A systematic search of various databases yielded 11 relevant studies, which were included in the analysis. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using Microsoft Excel 2021 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 17 software. Result: The pooled mortality rate among burn patients in Ethiopian hospitals was determined to be 6.99% (95% CI: 4.8, 9.41). Factors significantly associated with mortality included inadequate resuscitation (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 3.73, 95% CI: 1.31, 10.58), pre-existing illness (AOR: 5.26, 95% CI: 2.12, 13.07), age <5 or >60 (AOR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.45, 3.40), and burn injury >20% total body surface area (AOR: 5.17, 95% CI: 2.47, 10.80). Conclusion: The findings underscore a notably high prevalence of burn-related mortality in Ethiopia, with inadequate fluid resuscitation, pre-existing illness, extreme age, and the extent of injury identified as key determinants. Collaboration among healthcare stakeholders and policymakers is imperative to improve burn care services and mitigate the impact of these injuries. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023494159), providing a comprehensive overview of burn injury mortality in Ethiopia. Lay Summary: Burn injuries are a significant health concern globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Ethiopia. Despite the existing studies on burn injuries, there's a lack of synthesized evidence on burn injury mortality in Ethiopia. This study aimed to evaluate the combined prevalence of burn-related mortality and its determinants in Ethiopian hospitals.The study systematically reviewed 11 relevant studies and conducted a meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of burn injury mortality and associated factors. The pooled mortality rate among burn patients in Ethiopian hospitals was found to be 6.99%. Factors significantly associated with mortality included inadequate resuscitation, pre-existing illness, age <5 or >60, and burn injury >20% total body surface area.The findings underscore a notably high prevalence of burn-related mortality in Ethiopia, highlighting the need for comprehensive and effective treatment approaches. Inadequate fluid resuscitation, pre-existing illness, extreme age, and the extent of injury were identified as key determinants of mortality. Addressing these factors is crucial for improving burn care outcomes and reducing the burden of burn injuries in Ethiopian hospitals.This study provides valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers working towards improving burn injury outcomes in Ethiopia. By understanding the factors influencing treatment outcomes, healthcare stakeholders can refine treatment protocols, enhance resource allocation, and implement preventive measures to reduce the burden of burn injuries in Ethiopian hospitals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.013 | 0.026 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".