Community-defined Food Security and the Socio-Cultural Economic Cost of Food Insecurity in Eeyou Istchee, Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This co-developed community-based research project seeks to understand the role and place of ‘ᒦᒋᒼ ᐄᔨᔫ ᒥᔪᐱᒪᑎᓱᐃᐧᐣ Eeyou meechum miyo pimatisiwin (Good life of Cree food) to the residents of Eeyou Istchee, Québec. This awîyak kanisitohtahk ᐊᐄᐧᔭᐠ ᑲᓂᓯᑐᐦᑕ or an understanding comes from the lived experience and sharing of knowledge keepers and community food activist. Firmly grounded in Indigenous Research Methods and expressing a deep respect for my relatives. This project is central to my PhD dissertation and is a love letter to the Territory. The journey begins with defining the ontology of Eeyou meechum miyo pimatisiwin through an analysis of food systems discourse related to Indigenous law and food security. The story will then travel into the territory; to navigate and understand the origins of how the Eeyou Cree developed an ecosophy and philosophy regarding food. This section will look at the history of settler-Eeyouch relations in negotiations, sovereignty, and food. The last leg of the journey will share the stories and learnings that contain the meaning of what contemporary Eenouch are looking for in the quest for Eeyou meechumhood (A Cree food system).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".