MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408464252 · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07853-y

An automated high-throughput lighting system for screening photosynthetic microorganisms in plate-based formats

2025· article· en· W4408464252 on OpenAlexaff
Avery J. C. Noonan, Paula M. N. Cameron, Kalen Dofher, Nannaphat Sukkasam, Tony Liu, Lucas Rönn, Tanakarn Monshupanee, Steven Hallam

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalGenome British ColumbiaHudbay Minerals (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThroughputComputer sciencePhotosynthesisMicroorganismEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligenceBiologyBotanyWirelessOperating systemBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capacity of photosynthetic microorganisms to fix carbon dioxide into biomass positions them as promising cell factories for sustainable biomanufacturing. However, limitations in screening throughput hinder the identification of enzymes, strains, and growth conditions needed to realize this potential. Here we present a microplate-based high-throughput cultivation system that can be integrated into existing automation infrastructure and supports growth of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic photosynthetic microorganisms. We validate this system by optimizing BG-11 medium compositions for Synechococcus elongatus UTEX 2973, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii UTEX 90 and Nostoc hatei CUBC1040, resulting in growth rates increases of 38.4% to 61.6%. We also identify small molecules that influence growth rates in Synechococcus elongatus UTEX 2973, including candidate compounds for growth rate increase and dozens that prevent growth. The sensitivity, throughput, and extensibility of this system support screening, strain isolation, and growth optimization needed for the development of photosynthetic microbial cell factories. A high-throughput cultivation system enables users to leverage existing infrastructure and expands the range of applications in functional screening, strain isolation, and growth optimization for the development of photosynthetic microbial cell factories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications BiologySame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207