MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408466297 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16705

Quantifying Soil Inorganic Matter: Integrating Shifted Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS) with Machine Learning for Enhanced Analysis of Carbonates

2025· preprint· en· W4408466297 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Poursorkh, Natalia Solomatova, Edward R. Grant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMira Geoscience (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcitationRaman spectroscopySpectroscopyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceEnvironmental chemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil carbonates are critical players in the global carbon cycle and have a profound influence on soil health and agricultural productivity. Their quantification is also central to carbon sequestration efforts, where accurate measurement of soil carbonates can inform strategies for reducing atmospheric CO2. However, conventional methods of carbonate analysis in soil---while effective---are often slow, costly, and labor-intensive (1).In this study, we introduce Shifted Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS) as a rapid, non-destructive alternative, further enhanced by advanced preprocessing techniques and machine learning algorithms. Specifically, we employ Asymmetric Least Squares (ALS) for background correction, Standard Normal Variate (SNV) for normalization, and Savitzky–Golay filtering for smoothing. Unlike conventional Raman spectroscopy, SERDS effectively eliminates background fluorescence and reduces overlapping peaks, resulting in clearer spectral signatures (2). We employed Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to predict the inorganic carbon content from the carbonate vibrational modes in conventional Raman and SERDS spectra, benchmarked against total inorganic carbon (TIC) measurements from coulometric titration. Our results show that switching to dual-laser SERDS substantially boosted model performance. For PLSR, the coefficient of determination (R2) improved from 0.8 to 0.88 (an increase of about 10.5%), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) declined from 0.29 to 0.22 (26% decrease). The XGBoost model exhibited an even greater increase, with R2 increasing from 0.63 to 0.93 (approximately 49% improvement) and RMSE dropping from 0.39 to 0.16 (59% reduction).Figure 1: Left: All SERDS data of soil samples showing the main carbonate peak; Right: XGBoost model prediction of soil inorganic carbon using SERDS data.These findings underscore the potential of SERDS to replace conventional methods for carbonate quantification, offering reduced cost, faster analysis, and essentially no sample preparation. Furthermore, by providing highly accurate carbonate measurements, this methodology can be pivotal for carbon sequestration assessments and large-scale soil management practices, helping to advance both environmental sustainability and agricultural productivity.References:1) Barra I, Haefele SM, Sakrabani R, Kebede F. Soil spectroscopy with the use of chemometrics, machine learning and pre-processing techniques in soil diagnosis: Recent advances–A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2021 Feb 1;135:116166.2) Orlando A, Franceschini F, Muscas C, Pidkova S, Bartoli M, Rovere M, Tagliaferro A. A comprehensive review on Raman spectroscopy applications. Chemosensors. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):262.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→