MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408467172 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-18734

Constraining the P-T-t history of sapphirine bearing granulites and associated rocks from the 2.9 Ga Fiskenæsset Anorthosite Complex, SW Greenland

2025· preprint· en· W4408467172 on OpenAlexaff
Sampriti Basak, Kristoffer Szilas, Vincent van Hinsberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnorthositeGranuliteGeologyGeochemistryBearing (navigation)PetrologyGeomorphologyFaciesGeographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the best preserved Archean igneous complexes in the world is located in the Fiskenæsset region in SW Greenland and is known as the Fiskenæsset Anorthosite Complex (FAC). The region hosts a variety of high-grade rock types ranging from anorthosites (clino-orthopyroxene / amphibole bearing), metaperidotites, garnetiferous amphibolites, garnetiferous pyroxenites and chromitites. Several studies have interpreted this region to represent a subduction zone setting with hydrous recycling of lithosphere and arc magmatism operating as early as the Mesoarchean, and leading to the formation of the anorthosites (Windley et al., 1973). This interpretations is, however, highly debated. The aim of our project is to constrain the metamorphic history of the FAC post their igneous emplacement, which started as early as the Neoarchean based on metamorphic U-Pb zircon ages (Polat et al. 2010, Keulen et al. 2010). This temporally constrained knowledge of Neoarchean P-T history can be used as fingerprints of the prevalent geodynamic setting in the region and thereby provide insights into the likely formation environment of the FAC, and, more broadly, information on the tectonic processes operating in the Neoarchean.Here, we report geochemical and petrological results for a group of highly aluminous, sapphirine-bearing amphibolites dominated by orthopyroxene, corundum, phlogopite and anorthitic plagioclase, along with associated garnetiferous amphibolites and granulites from the FAC. These metamorphosed mafic rocks occur as individual bodies and as enclaves within anorthosites. Using an integrated approach of petrography, detailed elemental mapping, geothermobarometry and phase equilibria modelling, we constrained the metamorphic P-T-t history of the terrain. The rocks have been subjected to a multistage metamorphic history with the mafic rocks metamorphosed to amphibolite (M1 metamorphism) at ∼5-7 kbar and ∼700°C to granulite facies conditions (M2 metamorphism) at ca. ∼11-12 kbar and ∼900°C, forming corundum and eventually sapphirine during retrogression and cooling (M3). A K-rich fluid is further affecting these assemblages during retrogression leading to phlogopitic biotite (formation. Our results further show that the peak metamorphic event at lower crustal depths can be traced back to ~2.63 Ga from in-situ Lu-Hf garnet geochronology. The M3 event appears to be accompanied by metasomatism and a further objective of this study is to constrain the type and composition of the fluid(s) responsible through thermodynamic modelling. This will help to improve our understanding of Archean crustal metamorphic processes and, in particular, the role of element-redistributing fluids in the evolution of cratons.References:Windley (1973) Bulletin Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse, 106, 1-80Polat A et al. (2010) Chem. Geol. 277(1-2), 1-20 Keulen A et al. (2010) GEUS Bulletin, 20, 67-7

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→