MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408467813 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19557

Changing properties of NADW cause AMOC weakening at 26.5°N

2025· preprint· en· W4408467813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ivenis Pita, Shane Elipot, William E. Johns, David Smeed, Ben Moat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The RAPID-MOCHA array monitors the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) at 26.5°N by combining contributions from wind-driven Ekman transport, the Florida Current, and the mid-ocean geostrophic flow derived from tall moorings. While the Florida Current transport has been remarkably steady over the past decades and the Ekman transport has been strengthening since 2004, the AMOC has been weakening since 2004 when the RAPID-MOCHA observations started. This study investigates the role of buoyancy anomalies along the deep western boundary (DWB) on the observed AMOC decline. The DWB presents density features typical of both upper and lower North Atlantic Deep Water (uNADW and lNADW, respectively), which are water masses formed in the subpolar North Atlantic and tend to flow southward along the North Atlantic western boundary until reaching 26.5°N. The uNADW can be divided into upper Labrador Sea Water (uLSW) and classical LSW (cLSW). Since 2004, the DWB has been getting lighter, largely due to warming, but with varying effects of salinity on the uNADW and lNADW layers. To isolate the influence of these water mass changes on the AMOC, we recalculated the AMOC by substituting the western boundary density profiles in a given layer (e.g., uNADW, lNADW, uLSW, cLSW) with monthly climatological values and compared the resulting estimates to those derived from the full RAPID-MOCHA data set. Between 2004 and 2023, the observed AMOC weakened at a rate of −0.8±0.7 Sv/decade, with DWB density anomalies accounting for 77% of this trend (−0.6±0.1 Sv/decade). Further breakdown reveals that the lNADW contributes 47% (−0.39±0.07 Sv/decade) and the uNADW contributes 33% (−0.27±0.07 Sv/decade) to the overall AMOC decline. When the uNADW is subdivided, the cLSW influences the AMOC weakening by −0.38±0.09 Sv/decade, similar to the influence of the lNADW, while uLSW acts to strengthen the AMOC by 0.11±0.03 Sv/decade. Experiments isolating temperature and salinity anomalies indicate that temperature anomalies drive approximately two-thirds of the DWB-induced AMOC weakening, with salinity playing a secondary but important role in the lNADW. These findings suggest that southward advection of buoyancy anomalies formed in the Labrador and Nordic Seas account for about 75% of the AMOC weakening observed at 26.5°N between 2004 and 2023, particularly highlighting the influence of cLSW and lNADW water mass changes. The trend of the residual signal (joint influence of Florida Current, upper ocean, eastern boundary and Ekman transports) is not statistically significant, whereas the DWB and individual water mass influence trends are significant at the 99% confidence level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207