Research on Factors Affecting Tourist Loyalty to Hanoi's Old Quarter: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research explores the factors that influence tourists' loyalty towards Hanoi Old Quarter, with tourist satisfaction as the mediating role. Following a survey, 467 responses were gathered, of which 18 were deemed invalid and excluded, resulting in 449 valid responses for analyze Cronbach's Alpha reliability and EFA discovery factors through SPSS. Consequently, six hypotheses were formulated and all were found to be supported. Factors such as "Attraction", "Safety", and "Food and Beverage" indirectly impact tourists' inclination to revisit through their satisfaction levels. Although the “transportation” system has an indirect effect on tourist loyalty, it is not deemed significant. Interestingly, while “accommodation” directly affects tourist satisfaction, it does not influence their decision to return to Hanoi Old Quarter. Additionally, the study offers recommendations for Vietnamese tourism enterprises to enhance tourist footfall in Hanoi Old Quarter, as well as better destination management strategies for this destination for governmental and relevant entities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".