A Conceptual Framework for Rural Women Social Entrepreneurs Looking at the intersection between gender and rural social enterprise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social enterprises create social, environmental, or cultural value through profitable trade. They address social needs, strengthen communities, improve people’s life chances or protect the environment (Scottish Government, 2016). They are prevalent in rural areas to address critical social needs as well as with entrepreneurs and community groups that wish to attract sustainable tourism or engage in socially and environmentally responsible business initiatives. Women, and therefore rural women, are at the forefront of social enterprise with 65% of women in leadership positions (Social Value Lab, 2019). However, there appears to be little support for rural women social entrepreneurs. A gap seems to exist in both research and policy between gender and social entrepreneurship. While countries such as Canada and Scotland have taken strides to support gender equality, women in business and the burgeoning social enterprise sector, the seemingly apparent lack of cohesion is present. This presentation will introduce a conceptual framework to intersect these areas through a rural lens. The work will be geographically situated in the Scottish Highlands and Islands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".