MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408472310 · doi:10.5206/mase/21096

Single server Markovian queueing system with working vacation, impatient customers and disasters

2025· article· en· W4408472310 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. S. Ohapriyadharsini, V. Suvitha

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueueing theoryQueueing systemComputer scienceMarkov processComputer networkMarkovian arrival processLayered queueing networkReal-time computingMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the single server Markovian queueing system that incorporates working vacations, disasters, and impatient customers. The server initiates a Vacation when no customers are present in the system, during which it continues to serve arriving customers at a reduced rate. Disasters occurs while the main server is either busy or on a working vacation; leading to the removal of all customers from the system and causing the server to break down. When the main server is down, it is sent for repairs, and a substitute server provides service at a reduced rate until the main server is restored. When a customer arrives while the server is busy, undergoing repairs, or on Working Vacation, an impatience timer is activated. Additionally, arriving customers activate an impatience timer if the server is busy, under repair, or on a working vacation. If service is not completed before the timer expires, the customer abandons the system. The paper further presents a cost analysis and numerical illustrations to evaluate system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics in Applied Sciences and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207