MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408483509 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-21512

Oxygen Stable isotopes in phosphate: what is next?

2025· preprint· en· W4408483509 on OpenAlexaff
Federica Tamburini, Thomas B. Hofstetter, Nora Bernet, Elena Evertz, Cheng Shi, Maja Siegenthaler, Christian von Sperber, Chiara Pistocchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopes of oxygenOxygenPhosphateRadiochemistryChemistryComputer scienceNuclear chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxygen isotopes in phosphate (δ¹⁸Oₚ) have rised interest as powerful tracers for environmental studies, offering valuable insights into phosphorus cycling, biological activity, and potential phosphate source tracing in diverse environments. By January 2025, more than 180 peer-reviewed studies have explored δ¹⁸Oₚ applications in Environmental Sciences, underscoring the interest in this tool, but also its limited application. Broader adoption of δ¹⁸Oₚ analysis is hindered by challenges such as the complexity of sample preparation, uncertainties in isotopic data interpretation, and the difficulty of identifying all endmembers in field-based studies.Recent advancements in high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), allowing the isotopic measurements of oxyanions at natural abudances, have addressed key technical limitations. This innovation facilitates the analysis of smaller samples, but recent research highlights the critical need for thorough sample preparation to ensure reliable results. These advances lay the groundwork for more extensive δ¹⁸Oₚ applications, particularly since HRMS are becoming more and more widespread.Central to δ¹⁸Oₚ studies is the process of phosphoryl transfer, a fundamental mechanism in numerous biological processes. Changes in the isotopic composition of oxygen in phosphate promoted by phosphoryl transfer is considered to reflect the metabolic status of living cells, positioning δ¹⁸Oₚ as a potential “thermometer” for assessing organism metabolic “health”. This capability is particularly evident in soil incubation experiments, where the extent of oxygen exchange during phosphoryl transfer recorded in the microbial phosphate pool correlates with respired CO₂. Such findings highlight δ¹⁸Oₚ's potential to link phosphorus cycling to carbon cycling, providing new perspectives on ecosystem functioning.To harness this potential, future research should prioritize 18O labelling approaches in controlled incubation experiments integrating ancillary data, such as CO₂ flux measurements, to elucidate the mechanistic links between metabolic activity and changes in isotopic values. Complementary field studies, incorporating detailed assessments of δ¹⁸Oₚ alongside CO₂ and other environmental parameters, are essential for validating laboratory findings and expanding their relevance to complex natural systems.By addressing these challenges and leveraging recent technical innovations, δ¹⁸Oₚ can emerge as a robust tool for deciphering phosphorus dynamics, their connection with metabolic processes, and their broader role in environmental systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.015
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207