Enhancing Wildfire Resilience: A Comprehensive Approach for the Wildland-Urban Interface and Infrastructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As wildfires increase both in frequency and intensity due to climate change, there is a pressing need to address the complex interactions between urban expansion and natural ecosystems. The paper explores the development of a novel framework aimed at enhancing resilience against wildfires, particularly focusing on the Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) and associated infrastructures. The approach proposes an integration of forest, spatial, and physical resilience strategies, leveraging advanced simulation modeling and real-time data to optimize wildfire preparedness and response. While traditional wildfire management has often treated these elements in isolation, the proposed framework emphasizes a holistic strategy that encompasses not just the immediate but also the extended socio-ecological impacts of wildfires. By utilizing cutting-edge technologies including geospatial analysis and artificial intelligence, the framework aims to enhance predictive capabilities and streamline evacuation processes, thus safeguarding both human and environmental health. The implementation of this integrated system is designed to support the infrastructure's inherent resilience features, promoting sustainable urban planning and development. This contribution to wildfire resilience research underscores the critical need for comprehensive planning and collaborative efforts across disciplines, aiming to create a robust buffer against the evolving threat of wildfires in susceptible regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".