MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408484454 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20149

Super-Resolution for Enhanced Fluvial Sediment Measurement in UAV Images 

2025· preprint· en· W4408484454 on OpenAlexaff
Xingyu Chen, Yucheng Liu, Jiamei Wang, Hongbo Ma, Marwan A. Hassan, Xudong Fu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvialSedimentResolution (logic)GeologyRemote sensingComputer scienceGeomorphologyEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drone imagery can efficiently perform large-scale riverbed grain size measurements. However, its applicability is significantly constrained by image resolution limitations. This issue is especially critical in mountainous areas, where sediments exhibit a wide range of grain sizes and spatial heterogeneity. To address this issue, this paper develops a new fluvial sediment measurement technique for UAV images using a deep learning technique super-resolution (SR). We first used RTK-based UAV technology to collect high-resolution riverbed grain orthophotos of different types of mountain rivers, with the collected UAV images having a resolution between 3~5 mm/pixel. Four types of super-resolution models Nearest Neighbor, Lanczos filter, SRCNN and SRGAN were trained to restore the high-resolution images from low-resolution riverbed images. Three automated grain sizing methods BASEGRAIN, GrainID and ImageGrains were applied to the images restored by SR models, and 113,456 manual grain labels are created as grain size baseline for model evaluation. The efficacy of all three models diminishes with decreasing resolution, with BASEGRAIN being the most robust and GrainID the most sensitive. Application of all four SR models model significantly increase the efficacy of grain size measurement, and SRGAN models with upscaling factor of 4 (SRGAN×4) outperform other models. Further analysis shows the minimum detectable sediment particle size of SRGAN×4 is 1 pixel, which exceed the minimal human vision limitation for detecting grain size. The SR technology proposed in this paper makes it more feasible to rapidly obtain the riverbed grain size over a wide range in mountainous rivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications→French-language works237,207→