MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408484597 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-20504

Detection of pollen and biomass burning particles using laser- induced aerosol fluorescence and in situ techniques during the PERICLES campaign 2023 in Switzerland

2025· preprint· en· W4408484597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marilena Gidarakou, Alexandros Papayannis, Kunfeng Gao, Panagiotis Gidarakos, Benoît Crouzy, Romanos Foskinis, Sophie Erb, Cuiqi Zhang, Gian-Duri Lieberherr, Maxime Hervo, Michael Rösch, Martine Collaud Coen, Branko Šikoparija, Zamin A. Kanji, Bernard Clot, Bertrand Calpini, Athanasios Nenes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollenIn situAerosolFluorescenceBiomass burningEnvironmental scienceLaserBiomass (ecology)Atmospheric sciencesBotanyOpticsMeteorologyGeographyBiologyPhysicsAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Payerne lidaR and Insitu detection of fluorescent biomass burning and dust partiCLES and their cloud impact (PERICLES) campaign (May - June 2023) took place at the rural site of Payerne, Switzerland (46.82o N, 6.94o E, 491 m a.s.l.), at the premises of MeteoSwiss station. PERICLES aimed to understand the spatio-temporal variability of different types of bioaerosols (biomass burning, pollen, dust, etc.) in the Planetary Boundary Layer and aloft (typically up to 2-5 km asl.) and their role in cloud formation. As bioaerosols play a crucial role in cloud formation and on human health, there is strong need to characterize them, both at ground level and aloft. Recently, elastic and fluorescence lidars have become important tools for characterizing bioaerosols’ types. In this study, we used a synergy of in-situ and laser remote sensing instrumentation to discriminate between pollen, dust and biomass burning bioparticles and evaluate their role in cloud formation. Biomass burning particles originated from long-range wildfires in Canada and near-range ones in Germany. High concentrations of pollen were recorded by in situ instruments (Hirst-type volumetric trap, Swisens Poleno and WIBS 5 NEO) at ground level. The EPFL elastic-laser induced fluorescence (LIF) lidar was used to provide vertical profiles of the aerosol elastic (baer) and fluorescence backscatter (bF) coefficients, along with the fluorescence capacity factor (GF), during the study period. Typical values of bF ranged from 1.5 to 8.5 x10-4 Mm-1 sr-1, while GF took values between 1-8 x 10-4. A 32-channel spectrometer detected the bioaerosol fluorescence lidar signals aloft (from ground up to 1-1.5 km height). Application of machine learning algorithms we were able to determine the percentage distribution of various pollen types (e.g. Dactylis glomerata, Quercus robur, Fagus Sylvatica and Betula pendula), which correlate well with ground-level pollen data and number concentrations of ice-nucleating particles (INPs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→