MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408486349 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-18338

Effects of permafrost thaw on N-cycle processes in a thermokarst system

2025· preprint· en· W4408486349 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucia Fuchslueger, Andreas Richter, Nicolás Valiente

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermokarstPermafrostEnvironmental scienceEarth sciencePhysical geographyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern peatlands store large amounts of carbon (C) as well as nitrogen (N) which amounts to ∼80 % of global C and N peatland stocks, making them important C and N reservoirs. With Arctic amplification warming the Arctic nearly four times faster than the global average, an increased permafrost thaw was observed even in very cold polar regions such as the Canadian High Arctic, where thaw depths already exceeded scenarios projected to occur by 2090, altering hydrology, geomorphology as well as nutrient cycling in the landscape, caused by but not limited to increased thermokarst formation. Thermokarst describes a landscape occurring when ice-rich permafrost, which is highly vulnerable to climate change due to lack of sufficient thermal buffering, thaws altering microbial decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM), including N pathways. Considering the effects of global warming on permafrost-affected peatlands in the Arctic, it is likely that the active layer will continue to deepen and thaw more and more permafrost and therefore, expose more formally frozen SOM to microbial decomposition, priming the N-cycling and increasing the N availability. Our work explores the changes in N-cycling in thermokarst landscapes, by incubation of soils with 15N stable isotope tracing to assess organic N depolymerization, N-mineralization and nitrification rates over time. Permafrost soils from the continuous permafrost zone on the uplands east of the Mackenzie Delta (Northwest Territories, Canada) from 3 different depths in the active layer and the upper permafrost, in two phases of thermokarst development were investigated. We performed a 15N tracing experiment, by incubating soils with a 15N-protein for 9 days and estimated 15N in dissolved organic N, microbial N and nitrate as well as ammonium. Our results show changing N-cycle processes with depth, as well as with progress of thermokarst stages. Generally microbial N uptake in active layers was favoured over N mineralization, while the contrary was the case in permafrost layers. This pattern might be connected to a microbial N-limitation in the upper soil layers leading to increased microbial N demand. In permafrost layers microbes show higher rates of N mineralization (ammonification), i.e., they excrete inorganic N, most likely because of a carbon limitation. With progressing thermokarst development a shift form microbial uptake focused processes to mineralization pathways was observed in the active layer. This trend might be due to increased N availability as ground collapses as a result of thawing and mixes the soil layers, leading to decomposition of previously frozen SOM. Permafrost layers favoured ammonification, however, samples from secondary thermokarst sites showed signs of N limitation at the end of incubation, most likely because of the long-term exposure of microbes to available SOM leading to depletion of the N stocks. With this work we contribute to unravelling the changes in N-cycle pathways in the thawing Arctic, shining a light on the consequences of climate change on these remote ecosystems. This study was funded by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions H2020-MSCA-IF-2020 within “NITROKARST” project (Grant agreement 101024321)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→