MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408486868 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16116

Daily Data-Driven Emulation of the Fire Weather Index: Deep Learning Solutions for Wildfire Risk Prediction

2025· preprint· en· W4408486868 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Óscar Mirones, Jorge Baño-Media, Joaquín Bedia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationIndex (typography)MeteorologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceGeographyWorld Wide WebPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildfires are an intensifying global challenge, driven by climate change, which increases their frequency, severity, and spatial extent. Accurate wildfire risk assessment and forecasting are essential for effective mitigation, resource allocation, and long-term planning. The Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) is a widely used fire danger rating system that integrates four primary daily meteorological variables—24-hour accumulated precipitation, wind speed, relative humidity, and temperature—into six components representing fuel moisture, ignition probability, and fire spread potential. Its temporal "memory" feature, which tracks moisture changes over time, makes it particularly valuable for capturing wildfire dynamics.However, the FWI reliance on specific daily input data at noon poses challenges for its application in regions or scenarios lacking such precise temporal measurements. To address this limitation, FWI proxies computed using daily mean data offer a practical alternative. Yet, these proxies often lack the fidelity required to fully replicate the FWI values.This study focuses on enhancing the emulation of the original FWI using daily mean data and other proxy variables by leveraging advanced deep learning techniques. We explore a spectrum of architectures, ranging from conventional machine learning models to state-of-the-art approaches like convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) networks. These models are tailored to capture the spatial and temporal complexities of wildfire behavior while maintaining robustness in the face of variable data availability.Our research centers on the Iberian Peninsula, a Mediterranean region highly vulnerable to extreme wildfire events. By utilizing high-resolution, geo-referenced datasets, we validate the ability of these models to emulate the original FWI with high accuracy. To enhance model interpretability, we integrate eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, providing actionable insights into the decision-making processes and addressing concerns about the "black box" nature of deep learning.This work demonstrates how daily data, combined with cutting-edge deep learning methods, can effectively emulate the FWI, offering a scalable and reliable solution for wildfire risk prediction in regions where traditional inputs are unavailable. The proposed models bridge the gap between limited data availability and the growing need for precise fire danger indices, enabling improved assessment and planning for wildfire-prone regions.By advancing the science of wildfire modeling through daily data-driven approaches, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of spatial and temporal wildfire dynamics. It highlights the potential of integrating geoscience, climatology, and artificial intelligence to develop practical tools for wildfire risk mitigation, resilience, and decision-making in a rapidly changing climate. Acknowledgments: This research work is part of R+D+i project CORDyS (PID2020-116595RB-I00) with funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. O.M. has received the research grant PRE2021-100292 funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→