MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408497622 · doi:10.1093/crocol/otaf021

Racial Disparities in Utilization of Medications and Disease Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

2025· article· en· W4408497622 on OpenAlex
Khaled Alsabbagh Alchirazi, Osama Hamid, Thabet Qapaja, Mohammad Aldiabat, Nour Azzouz, Motasem Alkhayyat, Miguel Regueiro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrohn s & Colitis 360 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVedolizumabAdalimumabUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineUstekinumabGolimumabOdds ratioInfliximabPouchitisCrohn's diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Although traditionally associated with White European ancestry, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased among different races and ethnicities. Large studies conducted in the United States and Canada have identified more complex disease phenotypes among Black patients. Our study aimed to investigate disparities in IBD treatments and outcomes between Black and White patients in the United States. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, adult IBD patients were divided into 2 groups based on race: Black and White patients with IBD, Crohn's disease (CD), or ulcerative colitis (UC). Medical therapy and disease outcomes were evaluated in both groups with 1:1 propensity-score matching. Methodologic limitations include the potential for missing data, lack of information on socioeconomic strata, and patient-level medication coverage plans. Results: In comparison to White patients, Black patients with CD were less likely to receive advanced therapies; Adalimumab (adjusted odds ratio- aOR 0.89), Certolizumab (0.81), Vedolizumab (0.66), Ustekinumab (0.82), or Tofacitinib (0.58). Black patients with UC were less likely to receive advanced therapies; Adalimumab (0.83), Golimumab (0.62), Vedolizumab (0.69), Ustekinumab (0.73), or Tofacitinib (0.55). Black patients with IBD were at higher odds of utilizing corticosteroids (CD 1.18 and UC 1.20) and opioids (CD 1.26 and UC 1.09). Black patients with CD had higher rates of hospitalization (1.35) and perianal abscess (1.56), perianal fistula (1.28), and intestinal fistula (1.38). Black patients with UC had higher rates of hospitalization (1.29), Clostridioides difficile infection (1.11), and toxic megacolon (1.34). Conclusions: There were racial disparities in IBD medical therapy and disease outcomes. Black IBD patients had lower treatment with advanced therapies, higher opioid and corticosteroid use, and higher IBD-related complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it