Predictive Maintenance Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence Digital Twin Technologies, and Internet of Robotic Things in Big Data-Driven Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Industry 4.0, predictive maintenance (PdM) is key to optimising production processes. While its popularity among companies grows, most studies highlight theoretical benefits, with few providing empirical evidence on its economic impact. This study aims to fill this gap by quantifying the economic performance of manufacturing companies in the Visegrad Group countries through PdM algorithms. The purpose of our research is to assess whether these companies generate higher operational profits and lower sales costs. Using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, the Hodges–Lehmann median difference estimate, and linear regression, the authors analysed data of 1094 enterprises. Results show that PdM significantly improves economic performance, with variations based on geographic scope. Regression analysis confirmed PdM as an essential predictor of performance, even after considering factors like company size, legal structure, and geographic scope. Enterprises with more effective cost management and lower net sales were more likely to adopt PdM, as revealed by decision tree analysis. Our findings provide empirical evidence of the economic benefits of PdM algorithms and highlight their potential to enhance competitiveness, offering a valuable foundation for business managers to make informed investment decisions and encouraging further research in other industries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".