MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408516147 · doi:10.29173/jaed520

Artists’ Statement Partnerships for Prosperity

2016· article· en· W4408516147 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Rutledge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityStatement (logic)BusinessArtPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dakhl'awd (Eagle Clan) and Kkhhittn (Raven Child Clan) are two of many clans that the Yukon First Nations have.The Eagle symbolizes grace, power, and has great intellectual abilities.The Eagle is a sacred, wise and noble creature representing power and prestige to the Yukon First Nations.The gift the Eagle shares is the ability of foresight and an indication of good times to come.In many stories, the Raven teaches us about life and right from wrong.The Raven symbolizes change in life, creativity, and humour.A key figure in Yukon First Nations' legends, the Raven is involved in many creation stories and is also recognized as the bringer of light as it is said that the Raven released the sun and moon.The Eagle is represented here by the panel to the left, and the Raven is illustrated as he crosses the Yukon River.The mighty Yukon River is shown to reflect the history that Yukon First Nations' people have with the land and the water.The Yukon River also represents the relationship that was built with other First Nation's and "outsiders" or non-Indigenous people as they established trade routes with them in partnership.Throughout the history of the Yukon, its inhabitants have prospered by trading and working together.Only through collaboration and partnership have the people survived and thrived to build a Territory that is culturally rich and diverse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207