MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408516567 · doi:10.1080/03115518.2025.2463062

Latest Cambrian–earliest Ordovician conodonts from far western New South Wales and their biostratigraphical significance

2025· article· en· W4408516567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yong Yi Zhen, Ian G. Percival, Patrick M. Smith, B. D. Webby

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcheringa An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianGeologyPaleontologyBiostratigraphy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report documents the conodonts recovered from the Andersons Tank Limestone Member (new name) and calcareous siltstone lenses within the Scropes Range Formation and from the Kandie Tank Limestone within the Kayrunnera Group of the central-southern Koonenberry Belt in far western New South Wales, Australia. Among 18 identifiable conodont species are two new species, Paltodus simplex sp. nov. and Variabiloconus delicatus sp. nov. The conodonts confirm that the age of the Kandie Tank Limestone extends from the latest Cambrian (Cordylodus proavus Biozone) to Early Ordovician (Chosonodina herfurthi Biozone), partly contemporaneous with the Andersons Tank Limestone Member that ranges from the latest Cambrian Cordylodus proavus Biozone to possibly earliest Ordovician (Cordylodus lindstromi Biozone). Occurrence of the index species Iapetognathus fluctivagus and Iapetonudus ibexensis in the middle part of the Kandie Tank Limestone provides direct correlation to the base of the Ordovician System defined at the Green Point section in western Newfoundland of North America, and to sections in Asia and South America. These new data have significantly improved our current understanding of the Ordovician biostratigraphy in the region and more broadly the geological history and evolution of the eastern Gondwana margin during the early Paleozoic. We provide detailed morphological comparison and formal designation of the lectotypes for the four species (I. fluctivagus, Iapetognathus jilinensis, Iapetognathus landingi and I. ibexensis) critical for defining and globally correlating the basal Ordovician.Zhen Y.Y.* [yong-yi.zhen@regional.nsw.gov.au] and I.G. Percival [ianpercival1952@gmail.com], Geological Survey of New South Wales, W.B. Clarke Geoscience Center, 947–953 Londonderry Road, Londonderry New South Wales 2753, Australia; P.M. Smith [Patrick.Smith@australian.museum], Paleontology Department, Australian Museum Research Institute, 1 William Street, Sydney New Sout Wales 2010, Australia, and School of Natural Sciences, 18 Wally’s Walk, Ground Floor, Macquarie University, Sydney New South Wales 2109, Australia; B.D. Webby [bwebby25@gmail.com], School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcheringa An Australasian Journal of PalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207