MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408519777 · doi:10.1109/tap.2025.3550364

Wideband True-Time-Delay Dual-Polarized Reflectarray Antenna for Satellite Applications

2025· article· en· W4408519777 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Shamsaee Malfajani, Karim Glatre, Jean‐Jacques Laurin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsSte. Anne's HospitalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandSatelliteDual (grammatical number)Antenna (radio)Communications satelliteTrue time delayDirectional antennaComputer scienceOpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsPhased array

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wideband dual-polarized offset reflectarray antenna (RA) using a novel wideband true-time-delay (TTD) unit cell is presented. This element is designed to accommodate large-size wideband dual-polarized RAs for satellite communications in the range of 10.7–14.5 GHz. The element, consisting of stacked microstrip circular patches coupled with an hourglass-shaped aperture and an embedded fork-shaped feed network, is designed to enhance both the bandwidth and phase range. A new arrangement for the elements is presented, which minimizes coupling between different elements and improves cross-polarization and element loss. For two polarizations, the linear phase range bandwidth exceeds 32% at the center frequency of 12.6 GHz (10.6–14.6 GHz). Exhibiting a linear phase range of over 800° at the center frequency (12.6 GHz) and maintaining an error of less than 45° across various frequencies compared to the TTD model, this element showcases exceptional dual-polarized wideband reflectarray performance. Measurement results show a maximum gain of 31.2 dBi at 12.6 GHz and 31 dBi at 13.5 GHz for vertical and horizontal polarizations (H-Pol), respectively. A 1-dB gain bandwidth of approximately 21% and a 3-dB gain bandwidth of around 31% are achieved for the vertical and H-Pols in an offset feed configuration. Sidelobe levels (SLLs) are maintained below −13 dB, while cross-polarization in vertical polarization (V-Pol) is kept under −30 dB across the entire band. For H-Pol, cross-polarization is maintained below −29 dB across the band, while SLLs remain better than −16 dB. Aperture efficiency measurements indicate values up to 57% and not less than 28% over the band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207