Identification of Genomic Instability-Associated LncRNAs as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of cancer, with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) as the predominant subtype. Despite advancements in targeted therapies, many NSCLC patients still experience poor outcomes due to treatment resistance and disease progression. Genomic instability (GI), a hallmark of cancer, defined as the increased tendency of DNA mutations and alterations, is closely linked to cancer initiation, progression, and resistance to therapy. Emerging evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs)-molecules longer than 200 nucleotides that do not encode proteins but regulate gene expression-play critical roles in cancer biology and are associated with GI. However, the relationship between GI and lncRNA expression in LUAD remains poorly understood. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed the transcript profiles of lncRNAs and mRNAs from LUAD samples in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and classified them based on their Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) score. The HRD score is an unweighted sum of three independent DNA-based measures of genomic instability: loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and large-scale transitions. We then performed a differential gene expression analysis to identify lncRNAs and mRNAs that were either upregulated or downregulated in samples with high HRD scores compared to those with low HRD scores. Following this, we conducted a correlation analysis to assess the significance of the association between HRD scores and the expression of both lncRNAs and mRNAs. RESULTS: We identified 30 differentially expressed lncRNAs and 200 mRNAs associated with genomic instability. Using an RNA interactome database from sequencing experiments, we found evidence of interactions between GI-associated lncRNAs (GI-lncRNAs) and GI-associated mRNAs (GI-mRNAs). Further investigation showed that some GI-lncRNAs play regulatory and functional roles in LUAD and other diseases. We also found that GI-lncRNAs have potential as prognostic biomarkers, particularly when integrated with HRD stratification. The expression of specific GI-lncRNAs was associated with primary therapy response and immune infiltration in LUAD. Additionally, we identified existing drugs that could modulate GI-lncRNAs, offering potential therapeutic strategies to address GI in LUAD. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that GI-associated lncRNAs could serve as valuable biomarkers for LUAD prognosis and therapeutic response. Furthermore, modulating these lncRNAs presents potential treatment avenues to address genomic instability in LUAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".